What's wrong widda chicken?
So I finished my Buffalo Trace pretty quick after that post, and I went to buy another bottle of bourbon. Well, I've tried Maker's Mark, and I've tried Buffalo Trace. I thought I was going to go for Knob Creek next, but convenience is a big thing in my life and I ended up with this pretty (hardy har har):
(i.e. they had it in Tesco and I couldn't be bothered to go to that fancy offies to get Knob Creek. And anyway, I went and they didn't have it in stock)
Anyway, my opinion is that Wild Turkey is not as....unique as Maker's Mark, but certainly follows MM in the harshness. I assume that that is what bourbon is about, and that Buffalo Trace is, in fact, an anomaly - it is far too smooth.
I'm liking Wild Turkey, actually. It's nice as a "high ball" - I have mine with carbonated water (soda), lots of ice, with a slice of lemon. Heaven! And thank God it's BST (British Summer Time).
Anyway, I've also been thinking lately at the difference of people's taste/palate sensation. One reason is my take on Maker's Mark - I've read comments on the net about how different and smooth it is. I beg to differ.
Then I hear CB tell me that the Colombian coffee I bought last time is a tad too acidic for his taste. I didn't think it tasted that bad; it was a good, cheap alternative to the Tesco limited edition (pah) El Salvadorean I so love (which, being limited edition, is not available anymore...). It certainly doesn't have the depth of aroma, the mellowness, but now that I can't have my El Salvadorean coffee from the supermarket, Colombian bog-standard is a good cheap alternative. (N.B. emphasis on cheap(er).) So now, I shall toy with various Central/South American coffee. I think Guatemalan wasn't too bad.
So there must be some kind of difference in palate - maybe it's to do with some taste buds on the tongue being different between either ethnicity, or diet or something. After all, umami had a late start in the tongue area competition, but we in the orient knew about it...
